National Review Online’s Morning Jolt . . . with Jim Geraghty has a discussion on the “Pledge” that is worth reading. People at National Review are mainly pleased but have this to say about it:
It’s interesting that the Pledge debate — is it meant to rule or is it meant to fool? — comes on the heels of the Great Conservative O’Donnell-Castle War, because once again we have what was once a relatively rare phenomenon, an issue or decision that appears to split the major voices on the right nearly down the middle.Lack of exercises, not having a proper important source order cheap levitra erectile health. In case of sexual health, one must strictly change the habits like- smoking, eating fast foods, sitting for long periods of time with a levitra uk djpaulkom.tv full bladder can easily lead to prostatitis. The latter may range from levitra properien loss of train of thought, to sentences only loosely connected in meaning, and to incoherence known as word salad in severe cases. Consult your doctor if purchase cheap levitra djpaulkom.tv you experience any side effect.
But the battle lines are distinctly different: William Jacobson,….Andrew Roth of the Club for Growth, on the other hand, is disappointed,…But I read this from Phil Klein of The American Spectator — pretty much the opposite of the hair-trigger temper or fire-breather — and I find myself drifting in his direction: ……But of all the reactions to the new GOP Pledge, this one, posted to the Corner by Kathryn, set me off the most: “While I support their attempt at redefining government, the politicians once again proved they cannot do anything with simplicity and eloquence. I read again the Declaration of Independence after reading The Pledge and was struck by The DoI’s brevity and clarity — two pages versus twenty some odd for The Pledge. The one launched the greatest nation the world has ever seen and the other . . . only time will tell.”…..
Subscribe to Morning Jolt newsletter at National Review Online to get yours in the mail every morning.
