From Pajamas Media:
Proof: New Records Show DOJ Lied About New Black Panther Dismissal
A FOIA request reveals contradictions in statements made to Congress, the Civil Rights Commission, and to the public. Some of these statements were made under oath
by J. Christian Adams.
Judicial Watch made an explosive announcement today about the Justice Department’s stonewalling in the New Black Panther voter intimidation case dismissal. Forced to bring a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit after DOJ rebuffed its public records request (so much for transparency), Judicial Watch obtained a privilege log from the DOJ last week.
It shows — in a rather dramatic way — that the DOJ has been untruthful about who was involved in the dismissal of the case.
[….]
Further, the logs show dozens of communications between senior DOJ political officials in the two weeks prior to the dismissal of the case.Congress and the public have been told — for over a year — that the dismissal of the New Black Panther case resulted from nothing more than a dispute between lowly career civil servants. Lapdog reporters have repeated this lie, if they even covered the case at all. The documents uncovered by Judicial Watch expose the ruse.
[….]
As deputy associate attorney general — a senior Obama political appointee — Hirsch emerges in the privilege logs as the fulcrum around which the New Black Panther case was dismissed. Both the brand and sildenafil super discover description is, in fact, the best way to overcome your premature ejaculation problem. Even cialis 5mg tadalafil though you love your job, but if your work is done faster and there is less risk involved. There order cialis are many reasons as to why men suffer from prostatitis during their lifetime. It makes you feel devastated and depressed. cialis 20mg no prescription Throughout April and May 2009, Civil Rights Division political appointee Steve Rosenbaum engaged in extensive legal analysis with Hirsch. In turn, Hirsch had extensive communications with Associate Attorney General Perrelli about the case. The emails are sometimes described as “deliberations” between the senior political appointees. These are deliberations which the DOJ inferred never existed. Nothing more than a dispute between civil servants, they repeated without equivocation.The privilege logs show at least thirteen communications between Hirsch and Perelli in the two weeks before the dismissal on May 15.
This is a fairly long article with very important information. Our DOJ is corrupted, we need to end this. Maybe these FOIA documents will get to the bottom of the case.
Read it all.
