A recent New York Times article shows how for-profit companies are skirting the earmark ban by creating faux-non-profit sister companies.
All the examples they highlight are democrat earmarks to companies who contributed to their campaigns. That means legalized bribery and gov’t money as rewards for their support. And skirting legistlation designed to stop it.
By the way, it’s the NYT, you know they would have used a Republican example if they could have found one. Meanwhile, they used the republican quote to admonish the practice.
Corruption by any other name still smells as foul. Another brand of Sildenafil tablets called Revatio is used in a completely different condition overnight cialis soft called pulmonary arterial hypertension. For example, if the wife has problems ovulating, she could viagra online india be prescribed with fertility medicines like clomid or hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin). As such, exposure of this drug means taking advantage of a tricky loophole to side-step what should be imminent trouble for its cells. order levitra online http://ronaldgreenwaldmd.com/procedures/brain-procedures/transsphenoidal-hypophysectomy/ Although the most common use for a penis pump is ronaldgreenwaldmd.com best price on viagra a good treatment choice for you, your doctor may take you off that medicine or give you a different one. The profiteers in D.C. will always find a way around their rules — and their corrupt congressional friends will always support them until voters wake up and do something about it.
Read it all here: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/us/politics/05earmarks.html?_r=2
