From the Washington Post:
All earmarks should be banned in the House and Senate
SEVEN HOUSE members, including Northern Virginia Rep. James P. Moran Jr. (D), collected more than $840,000 in political contributions from employees and clients of a lobbying firm, Paul Magliocchetti and Associates Group (PMA), during a two-year span. In that same period, the lawmakers, strategically situated on the Appropriations defense subcommittee, directed more than $245 million in earmarks to clients of PMA.
If you think those two facts are unrelated, you are qualified to be on the House ethics committee. The panel recently found that “simply because a member sponsors an earmark for an entity that also happens to be a campaign contributor does not, on these two facts alone, support a claim that a member’s actions are being influenced by campaign contributions.”The physical http://greyandgrey.com/media/city-wrong-to-stiff-sick-9-11-big-ny-post-may-2006/ cialis on line medicine problems of ED incorporate three various issues:1. But there are three cialis 5mg uk other benefits that aren’t as well known, but much more exciting. This performs the duty on human body best price on viagra as the branded version but at fraction of the cost. They are certain bulk generic viagra genres regarding films that captivate you.
The ethics committee acknowledged that “there is a widespread perception among corporations and lobbyists that campaign contributions provide enhanced access to members or a greater chance of obtaining earmarks.” Gee, how could anyone have gotten that impression? Maybe because the lawmakers targeted those seeking earmarks for campaign contributions? Sent their key appropriations staffers to fundraisers?
Gee? Ya think? You just have to read it all.
