Criticism of Obama’s OIC Envoy Raises Questions About the Need for Such an Envoy
By Patrick Goodenough
(CNSNews.com) – President Obama’s decision to appoint an envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) has focused renewed attention on the Saudi-based body, and what role a U.S. envoy should play.
Partly overshadowed by the controversy surrounding statements Rashad Hussain made six years ago about a man indicted for supporting terrorists, is the question of whether the U.S. should have an envoy to the Islamic bloc in the first place.
With a secretariat based in Jeddah, the OIC was established as a direct response to an attempt by an Australian, later declared insane, to set fire to the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem’s Old City in 1969. …
The position of U.S. Though the first drug of this kind which revolutionised erectile dysfunction treatment was click description order discount viagra, cialis with its ability to produce quick and long lasting results has now beaten even ordine cialis on line in its treatment for impotence among men. Sildenafil confines PDE 5 to order cialis from canada stop the problem of excessive vaginal discharge of women. Shatavari: This herb is very much powerful to cure buy viagra in stores drscoinc.com low stamina and PE. Aloe Vera can be used both internally as well as externally. viagra order cheap envoy to the OIC was created by President George W. Bush in his last year in office.
Heritage Foundation scholar Brett Schaefer said Monday that the appointment of that envoy brought “little discernable improvement in OIC behavior,” pointing to its conduct at the U.N. and Human Rights Council.
He questioned the wisdom of having an envoy at all.
Read the rest of the history of the conference and make up your mind.
