From Watts Up with That
Lindzen on climate science advocacy and modeling – “at this point, the models seem to be failing”The intake of prescription free cialis donssite.com along with nitrate medication can also lead to most common side-effects such as stomach pain, dizziness, diarrhea, stuffy nose, headache, allergic reactions such as sore threat, swelling in the face, lips and tongue. In the majority super active viagra of cases, there is hardly any doubt that now it is easy to find kamagra online. Peyronie’s Disease (a bending in erect penis), Phimosis (a tight foreskin), a tight frenulum (a piece of skin, which prescription du viagra joins the foreskin to the shaft of the penis). Another ingredient of the pill is Fenugreek Extract, which is clinically proven to improve libido cialis generico online by 81% and sexual performance by 63%.
This is a letter professor Richard Lindzen of MIT sent to the Boston Globe and was published today. It is well worth the read.KERRY EMANUEL’S Feb. 15 op-ed “Climate changes are proven fact’’ is more advocacy than assessment. Vague terms such as “consistent with,’’ “probably,’’ and “potentially’’ hardly change this. Certainly climate change is real; it occurs all the time. To claim that the little we’ve seen is larger than any change we “have been able to discern’’ for a thousand years is disingenuous. Panels of the National Academy of Sciences and Congress have concluded that the methods used to claim this cannot be used for more than 400 years, if at all. Even the head of the deservedly maligned Climatic Research Unit acknowledges that the medieval period may well have been warmer than the present.The claim that everything other than models represents “mere opinion and speculation’’ is also peculiar. Despite their faults, models show that projections of significant warming depend critically on clouds and water vapor, and the physics of these processes can be observationally tested (the normal scientific approach); at this point, the models seem to be failing.Finally, given a generation of environmental propaganda, a presidential science adviser (John Holdren) who has promoted alarm since the 1970s, and a government that proposes funding levels for climate research about 20 times the levels in 1991, courage seems hardly the appropriate description – at least for scientists supporting such alarm.Richard S. LindzenCambridgeThe writer is Alfred P. Sloan professor of atmospheric sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
