You will be surprised. Read this.
WWF: The ‘Para-Governmental Organization’ at the Epicenter of Climategate
John Rosenthal
What exactly is WWF? The mission of the self-described “conservation organization” is so nebulous that it is not even entirely clear for what words the acronym stands. Back in 1961, when WWF was founded as a private initiative, the initials stood for “World Wildlife Fund.” These are undoubtedly the words that most Americans at least still associate with them. In the meanwhile, however — since WWF began, as its online FAQ explains, “expand[ing] its work to conserve the environment as a whole (reflecting the interdependence of all living things)” — the official name of the organization has been changed to “WWF-World Wide Fund For Nature.” “More and more, however,” the FAQ entry continues tautologically, “ … WWF is known as simply ‘WWF’” — i.e., who cares what it stands for!And levitra 20mg prostatitis can affect adult males of all ages, the prevalence of adult males under 50 years of age is higher. Having an erection for more check out this link purchase generic viagra than 4 hours (Priapism) Severe decrease or loss of vision Severe decrease or loss of vision Severe decrease or loss of hearing Warning : This drug is not suitable for everyone. After a comprehensive understanding, we levitra 10 mg check this site out find that he falls flat when called on to perform in bed. However not clinically proven, but Sildamax is recommended for you cialis pills canada also useful for the treatment of depression, stress, nervine diseases, mental and physical fatigue, fistulas, asthma, arthritis, diabetes, hypertension, and piles.
What we do know, however, is that WWF has in recent years been one of the principal purveyors of climate alarmism. It would seem that the organization has still further expanded its brief to cover the conservation not only of “all living things,” but even of that non-living and, frankly, purely notional thing known as “climate.” It was thus WWF that served as the cited source for the IPCC’s now famously debunked claim, according to which at current rates of “warming” the Himalayan glaciers could be expected to melt by 2035. Indeed, Debbie Framboise has turned up dozens of citations of WWF in the IPCC’s 2007 “Fourth Assessment Report,” on everything from “mudflows and avalanches” to the allegedly destructive effects of climate change on “marine fish and shellfish.” Richard North of the EUReferendum blog has uncovered yet another dodgy WWF-referenced claim on the alleged effects of climate change on the Amazonian forests.
