I ran into this article at American Thinker. I have often wondered about this and I think Mr. Duke has some good answers to the questions on Soros’ ethics.
The Pathology of the Rich Socialist
By Selwyn Duke
People such as George Soros and Michael Moore certainly talk a good game, but the next Mother Teresa they are not. Mother Teresa never criticized the free-market system; wealth just wasn’t for her. These treating options help them levitra no prescription you could try here to build spam lists. There is no permanent cure brand cialis online for diabetes and hence, it is always recommended to consult doctor if you experience any kind of sexual problem that is preventing you from seeing your penis. But viagra prescription price aimhousepatong.com since you are not interacting with the physician prior taking the Kamagra dose. The positive effects of this drug are the viagra spain virtue of its extensively capable configuration that has been developed to fight against the diseases and get away from sub-health. Soros and Moore are quite the opposite. They will never take a vow of poverty and dedicate themselves to helping the poor. They just want our civilization to take a vow of poverty and become poor.
This has caused many to wonder: How can someone preach socialism while being the most rapacious “capitalist” imaginable? Well, I have a theory about this.
Read his theory here.
I didn't know that about George Soros. I believe that the major Democratic motive is jealousy – and greed. Mainly jealousy – they want what somebody else has earned and they try to put a nice face on it by giving "most" of it to the poor, or so they tell themselves. Actually, they think they will get rich off of managing it or "them", the ones who need help. And, indeed, they are doing exactly that.