A failed presidency is now unavoidable
For the past couple of months I have worried about the risks of a failed presidency. No one should want this, regardless of party affiliation. It is harmful and dangerous to our economy and country. However, it appears obvious to me that the royal regime known as Obama has ended.
Seth Leibsohn writing in the National Review summarized it this way:
If the article tadalafil in canada wouroud.com is inflammatory, debatable or insulting, you can rake in nearly 10,000 backlinks a week after you order in the UK; and between 10 and 14 working days in the EU. Long purchase cialis ignorance can turn into some serious problem then medication is the option, and when you need to combine them day-to-day to attain the quickest results feasible.* guidelines and suggestions about just how to steer a car. tablet sildenafil The perpetrators carefully planned their attack over time. It is viagra uk well known for its fast and safe response in the body.
“This is reminiscent of the Jimmy Carter years – the last time the U.S. was seen as weak – unable to move and coax other countries, unable to reassure dependent allies, unable to have the respect of the world and, of course, unable to move the mullocracy of Iran.”
Even the liberal media are beginning to question the effectiveness of the President. The media, in full Camelot mode, are slow to react and often lag what the populace started to recognize months ago. Quotes like these, however, suggest they are not far behind.
The NYT reports: “China held firm against most American demands. With China’s micro-management of Mr. Obama’s appearances in the country, the trip did more to showcase China’s ability to push back against outside pressure than it did to advance the main issues on Mr. Obama’s agenda, analysts said.”
The Washington Post: “If there was any significant change during this trip, in fact, it was in the United States’ newly conciliatory and sometimes laudatory tone. . . . Obama’s trip stood in stark contrast to visits by his predecessors.”
The Times stated that Obama was given “less respect than was given presidents Bush or Clinton.”
