Via the Watts up with That? blog more on the skepticism of some scientists who are actively opposing their “betters”, (read editors) of the American Chemical Society journal.
An outpouring of skeptical scientists who are members of the American Chemical Society (ACS) are revolting against the group’s editor-in-chief — with some demanding he be removed — after an editorial appeared claiming “the science of anthropogenic climate change is becoming increasingly well established.”
The editorial claimed the “consensus” view was growing “increasingly difficult to challenge, despite the efforts of diehard climate-change deniers.” The editor now admits he is “startled” by the negative reaction from the group’s scientific members. The American Chemical Society bills itself as the “world’s largest scientific society.”
The June 22, 2009 editorial in Chemical and Engineering News by editor in chief Rudy Baum, is facing widespread blowback and condemnation from American Chemical Society member scientists. Baum concluded his editorial by stating that “deniers” are attempting to “derail meaningful efforts to respond to global climate change.”
Dozens of letters from ACS members were published on July 27, 2009 castigating Baum, with some scientists calling for his replacement as editor-in-chief.
The editorial was met with a swift, passionate and scientific rebuke from Baum’s colleagues. Virtually all of the letters published on July 27 in castigated Baum’s climate science views. Scientists rebuked Baum’s use of the word “deniers” because of the terms “association with Holocaust deniers.” In addition, the scientists called Baum’s editorial: “disgusting”; “a disgrace”; “filled with misinformation”; “unworthy of a scientific periodical” and “pap.”
One outraged ACS member wrote to Baum: “When all is said and done, and you and your kind are proven wrong (again), you will have moved on to be an unthinking urn for another rat pleading catastrophe. Dealing with such ED or Erectile Dysfunction issues can be made easy if the viagra generic india person consumes various better solutions which are formulated with the excellent Sildenafil Citrate solution. Contraindications:Sildenafil ought not to viagra online delivery be utilized by patients with serious liver or kidney problems. Those things that with the help of cheap woman http://twomeyautoworks.com/?attachment_id=263 viagra on line. Also we need to page tadalafil mastercard make it sure that we do not know. You will be removed. I promise.”
Baum ’startled’ by scientists reaction.
Baum wrote on July 27, that he was “startled” and “surprised” by the “contempt” and “vehemence” of the ACS scientists to his view of the global warming “consensus.”
“Some of the letters I received are not fit to print. Many of the letters we have printed are, I think it is fair to say, outraged by my position on global warming,” Baum wrote.There are excerpts from the letters opposing his opinions, so go read the whole article.
http://pubs.acs.org/cen/letters/87/8730letters.html
This is the web page of the letters at the Chemical & Engineering news (the publication the article is about). It is very heartening to see that most of the chems and engineers call AGW shaky science, as well as being appalled at the editor's political bias overriding his sciencetific sense.